Understanding the Paris Agreement in the Pacific, Part 2
In part 1 of this series, we discussed the importance of the
recognition of the role of local government in the fight against climate change
in the Paris Agreement. Not only was this recognition groundbreaking, it is
absolutely critical for the effective implementation of climate adaptation
activities. While national policies and strategies on adaptation provide a
framework for action and allocate financing, the majority of activities take
place at the local level on a case by case basis.
What is important about the Paris Agreement is that it is
explicit about what needs to take place in order for adaptation to actually
work. It notes that adaptation should be ‘country-driven, gender responsive,
participatory and fully transparent,’ while ensuring the needs of ‘vulnerable
groups, communities and ecosystems’ based on science and local knowledge. This
last bit is integral - scientific responses are important but the Agreement
recognizes that communities have local wisdom and practices that have served
them well in the past and grounding current a future adaptation on this
knowledge will increase the resilience of communities because the processes
will be something that they inherently understand and accept, versus foreign
scientific methods which don’t always mesh with local culture and capacities to
sustain such processes.